The best campaigns are built to travel.
What we can learn from the agencies that make news before they make content.
In 1991, a man called Gerald Ratner stood up at the Institute of Directors annual conference at the Albert Hall.
He ran Ratners, one of the biggest jewellery businesses in Britain. Around 2,500 stores. Sales of more than £1.2 billion. A retail success story. He seemed untouchable.
Then he made a joke.
He told the audience his stores sold a cut-glass sherry decanter on a silver-plated tray for £4.95
"People say to me, how can you sell this for such a low price? I say, because it's total crap."
Then came the prawn sandwich line. Ratners sold earrings for less than the price of an M&S prawn sandwich, he said, but the sandwich would probably last longer.
The room laughed. The press was there. But customers saw it differently.
An estimated £500 million was eventually wiped off the value of the company. The following year, Ratner was gone, and the brand never really recovered.
What happened?
He did not launch a campaign or unveil a new message. He made a throwaway joke that told people what he seemed to think of his own products.
And it travelled faster than anything he could have paid for.
That is the thing about earned attention. You cannot manufacture it. You cannot schedule it. You cannot brief it into a content calendar.
But when it happens, nothing touches it.
The point is not that brands should say outrageous things and hope the press turns up. That is not a strategy. That is usually a disciplinary meeting.
The point is simpler. The strongest ideas travel.
They travel through headlines. Through conversations. Through social feeds. Through WhatsApp groups. Through people saying, “Have you seen this?”
Most brands spend almost all their time and money on the stuff they control. The owned media. The paid campaigns. The social posts that get 14 likes and a comment from someone’s mum.
They treat earned attention like a lucky accident. It is not an accident.
Think about how BrewDog built fame.
In 2011, when the business was opening bars in Edinburgh, Glasgow and London, it drove a tank down Camden High Street with a sign on the side that said “Craft beer for punks.”
You can like BrewDog or not. Plenty do not. But the thinking is clear.
The story was the campaign.
They did not start with a format. They did not ask, “What should we post on Facebook?” They started with something people might actually talk about.
That is a specific way of thinking. Start with a genuinely interesting idea. Then build everything else around it.
Or think about Paddy Power.
For years, Paddy Power was the most talked about brand in British advertising. Not because they had the biggest budget. They did not. Not because their ads were the most beautiful. They were certainly not.
Because every campaign started with a question. What will make people talk about this?
Not what will look good in the media plan. Not what will fill the content calendar. But what will make people actually talk.
A billboard outside a competitor's office. a topical stunt. A fake campaign that turned out to be real. Their best work understood that attention is not given because a brand has paid for space. It is given because the idea has earned a place in the conversation.
That is the gap many marketing plans miss.
You brief a creative agency to make content. They make content. It looks good. It performs reasonably. You brief it again next quarter.
Nothing builds. Nothing compounds. Nothing travels.
Meanwhile, the brand that started with a real story is getting written about, shared, debated, argued over and repeated.
The agencies that understand this think like journalists before they think like content producers.
They ask: what is the story here?
Not: what is the execution?
Not: what is the format?
Not: How many assets can we squeeze out of this?
The story first. Always the story first.
This is why the old split between PR, advertising, social and content feels increasingly unhelpful. The public does not experience your brand in departments. They experience the idea.
They do not care whether something came from PR, creative, social, brand, digital or comms. They care whether it is interesting, useful, funny, timely, brave, relevant or worth passing on.
That is why some of the most interesting agency models right now are the ones built on a PR foundation but equipped with proper creative and strategic tools.
Not PR agencies that have hired a designer or creative agencies that have hired a press officer. Agencies where the earned idea and the owned execution are built together, from the same brief, by the same people.
Because the best ideas are not channel ideas. They are human ideas. They can live in a headline, a film, a stunt, a social post, an event, a customer email, a shop window or a conversation in the pub. And they are always simple enough to repeat.
You could explain the BrewDog tank in one sentence. You could summarise the Ratner story over a coffee. You could describe the Specsavers line to a stranger in a pub and they would get it immediately.
That is not a coincidence.
Simplicity is not a style choice. It is how you know the idea is real. If you cannot explain it without a deck, it probably needs more thinking, not more slides.
In 2002, Specsavers launched a line. “Should’ve gone to Specsavers.” Six words. That was it.
But those six words were so simple, so human, so instantly applicable to everyday life that the public started using them. In conversation. In newspaper headlines. In commentary about football referees, politicians and anyone who had made an obvious mistake.
The brand did not place those stories. People placed them for free. Because the idea was interesting enough to live outside the ad.
That is the difference between a campaign and an idea. Campaigns stop when the budget runs out.
Ideas do not.
This piece was inspired by the work Pathfinder has been doing with The Orchard, a Channel Islands PR-led integrated agency with ambitions that go well beyond the press release. Sometimes a client opens your eyes to something you should have seen sooner.